与英特尔^(Intel)之前代号为Coffee Lake的处理器系列相比，包括英特尔酷睿^{(Intel Core)}i5-10600K 在内的全新Comet Lake CPU保持了相同数量的内核，但同时提高了基本频率和涡轮频率。^(CPUs)这对用户来说只能是好消息，应该会使英特尔^(Intel)的 i5 中端处理器与AMD的处理器相提并论。这一切都是真的吗？英特尔酷睿^{(Intel Core)}i5-10600K 如何与竞争对手相抗衡？阅读此评论并了解有关英特尔^(Intel)最新酷睿 i5-10600K 处理器的更多信息：

Intel Core i5-10600K：它对谁有好处？

英特尔酷睿^{(Intel Core)}i5-10600K 是您应该获得的处理器，如果您：

• 是一名游戏玩家，并且想要一款用于游戏的最佳英特尔^(Intel)台式机处理器
• 工作和生产力应用需要出色的处理器
• 想^(Want)升级到英特尔^(Intel)最新一代处理器和主板

优点和缺点

在我们完成对英特尔酷睿^{(Intel Core)}i5-10600K 的评测后，我们喜欢它：

查看价格：

Buy now

• 出色的游戏性能
• 非常适合生产力和商业用途
• 随时保持凉爽的温度
• 它已解锁，因此您可以根据需要超频
• 它有一个合理的价格
• 集成图形芯片

在不太好的方面，英特尔酷睿^{(Intel Core)}i5-10600K：

• 不支持PCI Express 4.0
• 具有高 TDP
• 使用LGA 1200插槽，因此您需要一个新的主板
• 不像锐龙 5^{(Ryzen 5)}处理器那样捆绑CPU散热器

判决

英特尔酷睿^{(Intel Core)}i5-10600K 是一款出色的桌面处理器，适用于生产力任务，也是游戏的绝佳选择。它提供了出色的单核和多核性能，证明英特尔^(Intel)终于可以与AMD的Zen 2处理器竞争。在制造工艺方面，英特尔^(Intel)落后于AMD，这意味着它的所有处理器，包括Core i5-10600K，都比AMD Zen 2处理器使用更多的功率。另一个缺点是它们不提供对PCI Express 4.0的支持，这代表了快速显卡和SSD的未来^(SSD)驱动器。撇开这些缺点不谈，如果您想要一款出色的处理器，可以很好地与当今的游戏和其他计算密集型应用程序配合使用，英特尔酷睿^{(Intel Core)}i5-10600K 是一个绝佳的选择。

硬件规格

英特尔酷睿^{(Intel Core)}i5-10600K 桌面处理器于 2020 年第二季度推出，其推荐价格约为 260美元^(USD)。它是基于英特尔14 纳米制造工艺的^(Intel)CPU，具有 6 个物理内核和 12 个线程。它的基础频率为 4.10 GHz，它可以达到令人印象深刻的 4.8 GHz的最大涡轮频率。基本时钟和涡轮增压时钟都比上一代英特尔酷睿^{(Intel Core)}i5-9600K 提供的（3.7 GHz和 4.6 GHz）更快。

在高速缓存方面，英特尔酷睿^{(Intel Core)}i5-10600K 获得 12 MB，超过了之前的英特尔酷睿^{(Intel Core)}i5-9600K 的 9 MB。但是，它比以相当相似的价格提供的AMD Ryzen 7 3700X或更便宜但在性能方面接近Core i5-10600K 的^(Core)AMD Ryzen 5 3600X 提供的数量要少。

英特尔酷睿^{(Intel Core)}i5-10600K与众不同的一件事是它还配备了集成图形芯片。它是Intel UHD Graphics 630，基本频率为 350 MHz，最大频率为 1.20 GHz，支持 60 Hz 的 4K 分辨率。它还支持DirectX 12和OpenGL 4.5，最多可使用 64 GB 的系统RAM。

Intel Core i5-10600K的默认TDP（热设计功率）^{(TDP (Thermal Design Power))}为125瓦^(Watts)。这比我们在Intel Core i5-9600K 上看到的要多得多，也比AMD的类似处理器要多得多。不幸的是，这意味着我们正在寻找可能需要大量电力才能运行的CPU 。这是因为它的频率很高，而且英特尔^(Intel)仍在使用 14 纳米光刻技术。

Intel的Core i5-10600K在双通道模式下支持以 2666 MHz运行的^(MHz)DDR4 RAM ，并且^{(DDR4 RAM)}只能使用 PCI Express 3.0^{(can only use PCI Express 3.0)}。尽管这些规格目前还可以，但它们落后于AMD的Zen 2处理器，后者支持更快的内存和PCI Express 4.0。

英特尔酷睿^{(Intel Core)}i5-10600K 处理器使用英特尔^(Intel)最新的 LGA 插槽，目前仅在使用Z490芯片组的高端且昂贵的主板上提供。支持该系列处理器的基于H470或B460芯片组的更实惠的主板应该会在不久的将来出现。但是，现在，如果您渴望英特尔酷睿^{(Intel Core)}i5-10600K，您应该准备好在 Z490^(Z490)主板上花费相当多的钱。这些主板的价格从 150美元^(USD)到 800美元^(USD)不等。

英特尔酷睿 i5-10600K 似乎是一款出色的中端台式机处理器。它的六个核心应为任何类型的常规活动提供足够的性能，其高基础和涡轮增压频率应使其成为高端游戏的绝佳选择。^{(The Intel Core i5-10600K appears to be an excellent mid-range desktop processor. Its six cores should deliver more than enough performance for any kind of regular activity, and its high base and turbo boost frequencies should make it an outstanding choice for high-end gaming.)}

在基准测试和游戏中的表现

我们在具有以下硬件和软件的 PC 上测试了Intel Core i5-10600K 处理器：^{(Intel Core)}

• 主板：华硕TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS^{(ASUS TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS)} ( WI-FI )
• 散热器：华硕 ROG Ryuo 240^{(ASUS ROG Ryuo 240)}一体式液体CPU散热器
• 内存：ADATA DDR4 RAM (2 x 8GB, 2666MHz)
• 显卡：华硕TUF ^(Card)RTX 2060 ^{(ASUS TUF RTX 2060)} GAMING OC
• 存储：ADATA XPG GAMMIX S11 240GB SSD
• 电源单元：ASUS ROG Thor 850W Platinum
• 操作系统：Windows 10 Pro x64，2020年 5 月更新^{(May 2020 Update)}

为了更好地了解Intel Core i5-10600K 提供的性能，我们将它与AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 处理器进行了比较，因为它们的价格相似，而且我们已经将 3700X 安装在我们的一台计算机上。除了我们用于AMD Ryzen 7 3700X（华硕 ROG Crosshair VIII Hero Wi-Fi^{(ASUS ROG Crosshair VIII Hero Wi-Fi)}）的主板外，两台计算机上的所有其他硬件组件都是相同的。

首先，我们使用CPU-Z对^(CPU-Z)Intel Core i5-10600K 进行了基准测试。在单线程^{(Single Thread)}测试中，它获得了 516 分的优异成绩。这意味着一流的单核性能，非常适合游戏。Intel Core i5-10600K仅比AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 慢 0.58%。

在CPU-Z的多线程测试中，英特尔酷睿^{(Intel Core)}i5-10600K 取得了 4056 分的成绩。它比AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 能做的要少。尽管如此，考虑到 3700X 比Intel Core i5-10600K 多两个物理内核，这是一个很好的结果。

我们在Cinebench R20^{(Cinebench R20)}中见证了相同的性能差异，它评估了渲染时的处理器性能。该基准的多线程测试使用了所有处理器内核，英特尔酷睿^{(Intel Core)}i5-10600K 管理了 3482 分。对于六核CPU^(CPU)来说，这是一个了不起的成绩。显然，AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 的八核在本次测试中取得了更好的成绩。

在Blender Benchmark中，我们选择渲染两个场景：bmw27 和教室。在这些测试中，处理器越快，完成场景所需的时间就越少。由于内核较少，英特尔酷睿^{(Intel Core)}i5-10600K 比AMD 锐龙 7^{(AMD Ryzen 7)} 3700X 慢。然而，Core i5-10600K 仍然取得了不错的成绩：渲染两个场景需要 16 分钟。

接下来，我们运行了PCMark 10，这是一款基准应用程序，用于评估处理器在日常日常活动中的性能。这意味着网页浏览、视频会议、应用程序启动时间、生产力和数字内容创建。在这些测试中，英特尔酷睿^{(Intel Core)}i5-10600K 的得分与AMD 锐龙 7^{(AMD Ryzen 7)} 3700X 的得分相似。虽然它有六个核心，而不是像 3700X 那样的八个核心，但Core i5-10600K 只慢了 2.15%。

同样在日常使用中，我们检查了英特尔酷睿^{(Intel Core)}i5-10600K 浏览网页的速度。为此，我们在Google Chrome中使用了^{(Google Chrome)}JetStream 2基准测试。该基准测试使用JavaScript和WebAssembly，您获得的分数越高，您的处理器渲染网站的速度就越快。我们惊讶地发现Intel Core i5-10600K 比AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 快 7.59%。对英特尔^(Intel)粉丝来说是个好消息，对吧？🙂

7-Zip 是一款文件压缩应用程序，非常适合检查处理器的速度。使用其基准测试，我们发现英特尔酷睿^{(Intel Core)}i5-10600K 可以提供约 40 MB/s的稳定数据压缩速度，仅比AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 低 9.1%。

我们使用7-Zip中的^(7-Zip)Intel Core i5-10600K测量的解压缩速度为 667 MB/s。它比AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 少 6.85%，但是，别忘了它少了两个物理内核。

英特尔酷睿^{(Intel Core)}i5-10600K 应该是游戏的绝佳选择，这就是我们接下来的测试的原因。为避免出现瓶颈，我们将我们测试的游戏配置为以 1080p 分辨率和最低图形质量设置运行。

在《古墓丽影^{(Tomb Raider)}》中，英特尔酷睿^{(Intel Core)}i5-10600K^(Shadow)的CPU 渲染^{(CPU Render)}分数为每秒 265 帧，仅比我们在AMD Ryzen 7 3700X上获得的分数低 2.93%。这真是令人印象深刻！如果显卡也能承受这个负担，这个CPU可以以最大的视觉效果运行任何游戏。^(CPU)

在Metro Exodus（我们见过的最费力的游戏之一）中，英特尔酷睿^{(Intel Core)}i5-10600K 平均每秒渲染 139 帧。再一次，这比AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 可以管理的要好一点：fps 提高 1.46%。

在针对多核处理器优化的游戏World War Z中， ^{(World War Z)}AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 比Intel Core i5-10600K 更快：225 对 200 fps。这意味着英特尔酷睿^{(Intel Core)}i5-10600K 比锐龙 3700X^{(Ryzen 3700X)}慢 12.5% 。尽管如此，无论您如何表达，这都是一个出色的结果！

最后，我们还测试了刺客^(Assassin)信条奥德赛^{(Creed Odyssey)}，这是另一个具有令人印象深刻的视觉效果和对硬件能力要求非常高的游戏。事实证明，英特尔酷睿^{(Intel Core)}i5-10600K 比AMD 锐龙 7^{(AMD Ryzen 7)} 3700X 略快，尽管差距微不足道：渲染的 fps 提高了 1.89%。结论：英特尔酷睿^{(Intel Core)}i5-10600K 不仅适用于游戏，它还是一款出色的处理器，可以以最高的图形质量运行任何游戏！

为了测试Intel Core^{(Intel Core)} i5-10600K达到的温度，我们使用Prime95对其进行了压力测试，同时使用^(Prime95)Open Hardware Monitor密切关注它。为了冷却处理器，我们使用了华硕 ROG Ryuo 240 ^{(ASUS ROG Ryuo 240)} AIO冷却器和北极 MX-4^{(Arctic MX-4)}导热膏。如下图所示，处理器的温度没有超过 68摄氏度^(Celsius)，这是一个很好的结果。

另一方面，英特尔酷睿^{(Intel Core)}i5-10600K 的功耗被证明是相当高的。它需要高达 137瓦^(Watts)，这比AMD Ryzen 7 3700X所需的 90瓦要多得多。^(Watts)

事实证明，英特尔酷睿 i5-10600K 是台式计算机处理器领域的有力竞争者。凭借其六核和快速的单核频率，它在工作和生产力方面提供了出色的性能，在游戏方面表现出色。唯一不好的是功耗，比竞争对手提供的要高。^{(The Intel Core i5-10600K proves to be a powerful contender in the world of desktop computer processors. With its six cores and fast single-core frequency, it delivers outstanding performance in work and productivity, and it shines when it comes to gaming. The only thing that's not great is power consumption, which is higher than what the competition offers.)}

您对英特尔酷睿^{(Intel Core)}i5-10600K 有何看法？

现在您知道我们为什么喜欢英特尔酷睿^{(Intel Core)}i5-10600K 处理器了，而且您还必须了解它的弱点。我们很高兴看到英特尔^(Intel)终于重新开始营业，并设法与AMD的Zen 2处理器竞争。英特尔^(Intel)和AMD之间的激烈竞争只会对我们消费者有利。你对此事有何看法？在下面的评论中让我们知道您是否喜欢英特尔酷睿^{(Intel Core)}i5-10600K 以及您喜欢的原因。

Review Intel Core i5-10600K: An outstanding mid-range processor!

Compared to Intel's previоus line of processors, codenamed Coffee Lake, the new Comet Lake CPUs, Intel Core i5-10600K included, keep the same number of cores, but ramp up both the base and the turbo frequencies. That can only mean good news for users and should bring Intel's i5 mid-range processors up to par with AMD's. Is all that true, and how does the Intel Core i5-10600K measure against the competition? Read this review and find out more about the latest Core i5-10600K processor from Intel:

Intel Core i5-10600K: Who is it good for?

The Intel Core i5-10600K is the processor you should get if you:

• Are a gamer and want one of the best Intel desktop processors for gaming
• Need an excellent processor for work and productivity apps
• Want to upgrade to Intel's latest generation of processors and motherboards

Pros and cons

After we finished reviewing the Intel Core i5-10600K, here's what we like about it:

See price on:

Buy now

• Outstanding performance in gaming
• Excellent for productivity and business use
• Cool temperatures at all times
• It's unlocked, so you can overclock it if you want
• It has a reasonable price
• Integrated graphics chip

On the not-so-great side of things, the Intel Core i5-10600K:

• Offers no support for PCI Express 4.0
• Has a high TDP
• Uses the LGA 1200 socket, so you need a new motherboard for it
• Doesn't bundle a CPU cooler, like Ryzen 5 processors do

Verdict

The Intel Core i5-10600K is a great desktop processor for productivity tasks and an outstanding choice for gaming. It offers serious performance, both single-core and multi-core, and it proves that Intel can finally compete with AMD's Zen 2 processors. Intel is behind AMD when it comes to their manufacturing process, and this means that all its processors, including the Core i5-10600K use more power than AMD Zen 2 processors. Another downside is that they don't provide support for PCI Express 4.0, which represents the future for fast video cards and SSD drives. Leaving these downsides aside, if you want a great processor, that works well with today's games and other computing-intensive apps, the Intel Core i5-10600K is an excellent choice.

Hardware specifications

The Intel Core i5-10600K desktop processor was launched in the second quarter of 2020, and its recommended price is about 260 USD. It's a CPU built on Intel's 14 nm manufacturing process and comes with 6 physical cores and 12 threads. Its base frequency is 4.10 GHz, and it can reach an impressive maximum turbo frequency of 4.8 GHz. Both the base and the turbo boost clocks are faster than what the previous generation Intel Core i5-9600K offered (3.7 GHz and 4.6 GHz).

Regarding cache memory, the Intel Core i5-10600K gets 12 MB, which is more than the previous Intel Core i5-9600K had: 9 MB. However, it's a lesser amount than what an AMD Ryzen 7 3700X offers for a fairly similar price, or an AMD Ryzen 5 3600X, which is cheaper, but close to the Core i5-10600K in terms of performance.

One thing that differentiates the Intel Core i5-10600K is the fact that it also comes with an integrated graphics chip. It's an Intel UHD Graphics 630 with a base frequency of 350 MHz and a maximum of 1.20 GHz that supports 4K resolution at 60 Hz. It also features support for DirectX 12 and OpenGL 4.5 and can use up to 64 GB of the system's RAM.

The default TDP (Thermal Design Power) of the Intel Core i5-10600K is 125 Watts. That's quite a lot, much more than what we saw on the Intel Core i5-9600K and also much more than AMD's similar processors. Unfortunately, this means that we're looking at a CPU that probably needs a lot of power to run. It's a consequence of both the fact that its frequencies are high and that Intel is still using the 14 nm lithography.

Intel's Core i5-10600K supports DDR4 RAM running at 2666 MHz in dual-channel mode and can only use PCI Express 3.0. Although these specs are OK in the present, they are behind AMD's Zen 2 processors, which support faster memory and also PCI Express 4.0.

The Intel Core i5-10600K processor uses Intel's latest LGA socket, which, at the moment, is available only on the premium and costly motherboards that use the Z490 chipset. More affordable motherboards based on H470 or B460 chipsets that support this range of processors should come in the near future. However, right now, if you're longing for an Intel Core i5-10600K, you should be prepared to also spend quite a bit of money on a Z490 mainboard. These motherboards can cost anywhere from 150 USD to 800 USD or more.

The Intel Core i5-10600K appears to be an excellent mid-range desktop processor. Its six cores should deliver more than enough performance for any kind of regular activity, and its high base and turbo boost frequencies should make it an outstanding choice for high-end gaming.

Performance in benchmarks and games

We tested the Intel Core i5-10600K processor on a PC with the following hardware and software:

• Motherboard: ASUS TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS (WI-FI)
• Cooler: ASUS ROG Ryuo 240 all-in-one liquid CPU cooler
• Memory: ADATA DDR4 RAM (2 x 8GB, 2666MHz)
• Graphics Card: ASUS TUF RTX 2060 GAMING OC
• Storage: ADATA XPG GAMMIX S11 240GB SSD
• Power Supply Unit: ASUS ROG Thor 850W Platinum
• Operating System: Windows 10 Pro x64 with May 2020 Update

To get a better idea about the performance offered by the Intel Core i5-10600K, we compared it with an AMD Ryzen 7 3700X processor because their prices are similar, and we already had the 3700X mounted in one of our computers. Except for the motherboard we used for the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X (ASUS ROG Crosshair VIII Hero Wi-Fi), all the other hardware components were identical on both computers.

First, we benchmarked the Intel Core i5-10600K using CPU-Z. In the Single Thread test, it got an excellent score of 516 points. It means top-notch single-core performance, which is great for gaming. The Intel Core i5-10600K is only 0.58% slower than the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X.

In CPU-Z's Multi-Thread test, Intel Core i5-10600K achieved a score of 4056 points. It's less than what the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X can do. Still, it's an excellent result considering that the 3700X has two physical cores more than the Intel Core i5-10600K.

We witnessed the same difference in performance in Cinebench R20, which evaluates the processor performance at rendering. This benchmark's multi-thread test uses all the processor cores, and the Intel Core i5-10600K managed 3482 points. It is an outstanding result for a six-core CPU. Obviously, AMD Ryzen 7 3700X's eight cores lead to a better result in this test.

In the Blender Benchmark, we chose to render two scenes: bmw27 and classroom. In these tests, the faster the processor, the less time needed to finalize the scenes. The Intel Core i5-10600K was slower than the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, due to its fewer cores. However, the Core i5-10600K still managed a great result: 16 minutes to render both scenes.

Next, we ran PCMark 10, a benchmark app that evaluates the performance of the processor in regular daily activities. That means web browsing, video conferencing, app start-up times, productivity, and digital content creation. In these tests, Intel Core i5-10600K had a score that was similar to that of the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X. Although it has six cores, not eight like the 3700X, the Core i5-10600K was only 2.15% slower.

On the same note - everyday use - we checked how fast the Intel Core i5-10600K is at browsing the web. To do that, we used the JetStream 2 benchmark in Google Chrome. This benchmark uses JavaScript and WebAssembly, and the higher score you get, the faster your processor is at rendering websites. We were surprised to find out that the Intel Core i5-10600K was 7.59% faster than the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X. Good news for Intel fans, right? 🙂

7-Zip is a file compression app that's great for checking how fast your processor is. Using its benchmark, we found that the Intel Core i5-10600K can deliver a steady data compression speed of about 40 MB/s, which is just 9.1% less than what you get from an AMD Ryzen 7 3700X.

The decompression speed that we measured using the Intel Core i5-10600K in 7-Zip was 667 MB/s. It's 6.85% less than on an AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, but hey, don't forget that it has two fewer physical cores.

The Intel Core i5-10600K should be an excellent choice for gaming, so that's why our next tests were about that. To avoid bottlenecks, we configured the games we tested to run in 1080p resolution and with the lowest graphics quality settings.

In Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Intel Core i5-10600K got a CPU Render score of 265 frames per second, which is just 2.93% less than what we got on the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X. That's really impressive! This CPU can run any game at maxed visuals if the graphics card can handle the burden too.

In Metro Exodus, one of the most taxing games we've seen, the Intel Core i5-10600K rendered an average of 139 frames per second. Once again, that's a bit better than what the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X could manage: 1.46% more fps.

In World War Z, a game that's optimized for multi-core processors, the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X was faster than the Intel Core i5-10600K: 225 vs. 200 fps. That means that the Intel Core i5-10600K is 12.5% slower than the Ryzen 3700X. Still, it is an outstanding result regardless of how you put it!

Finally, we also tested Assassin's Creed Odyssey, another title that features impressive visuals and a very demanding game in terms of hardware power. The Intel Core i5-10600K proved to be slightly faster than the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, although by an insignificant margin: 1.89% more fps rendered. The conclusion: Intel Core i5-10600K is not just good for gaming, it's a fantastic processor that can run any game at maximum graphics quality!

To test the temperatures reached by the Intel Core i5-10600K, we stressed it with Prime95 while keeping an eye on it with Open Hardware Monitor. To cool the processor, we used an ASUS ROG Ryuo 240 AIO cooler and Arctic MX-4 thermal paste. As you can see in the chart below, the processor didn't get hotter than 68 degrees Celsius, which is an excellent result.

On the other hand, the power consumption of the Intel Core i5-10600K proved to be quite high. It required up to 137 Watts, which is a lot more than the 90 Watts required by an AMD Ryzen 7 3700X.

The Intel Core i5-10600K proves to be a powerful contender in the world of desktop computer processors. With its six cores and fast single-core frequency, it delivers outstanding performance in work and productivity, and it shines when it comes to gaming. The only thing that's not great is power consumption, which is higher than what the competition offers.

What is your opinion about the Intel Core i5-10600K?

Now you know why we like the Intel Core i5-10600K processor, and you also got to hear about its weaknesses. We're happy to see Intel finally getting back in business and that it manages to compete with AMD's Zen 2 processors. The heated competition between Intel and AMD can only be great for us, consumers. What's your opinion on the matter? Let us know in the comments below whether you like the Intel Core i5-10600K and your reasons for that.

Related posts

• Intel Core i5-12600K评测：今年最好的中端游戏CPU？

• 英特尔酷睿第 12 代 i7-12700K 评测：重回游戏！

• 第 12 代英特尔酷睿处理器上的 Windows 11 与 Windows 10

• ADATA XPG Lancer DDR5-5200 RAM 评测：非常适合英特尔第 12 代！

• 回顾 ADATA XPG Gammix S50：适用于游戏玩家的闪电般的 SSD！

• 华硕 Mini PC PB60G：小巧、强大、可堆叠的 PC

• Review ASUS RT-AX68U：用于Wi-Fi 6的经典重新设计！

• 金士顿 KC3000 评测：最快的 SSD 之一！-

• 回顾华硕 ROG Strix Scope：年度最佳游戏键盘之一！

• 2021的AMD VS. INTEL desktop处理器：Which CPUs更好？

• 华硕 ZenScreen Go MB16AWP 评测：功能丰富的便携式显示器

• Kingston DataTraveler microDuo 3C - 具有 USB C 型和 USB 3.0 连接的双记忆棒

• 华硕 ROG Delta 评测：发烧友的出色音效

• ASUS TUF Gaming GT301 review：紧凑型mid-tower computer case

• ADATA XPG Gammix S11 Pro SSD 评测：游戏和高性能！

• 回顾 TP-Link Deco M5 v2：一个漂亮的全家 WiFi 系统！

• 华硕 ROG Strix B660-F Gaming WiFi 评测：优秀的主板！

• 回顾 HyperX Alloy Elite RGB：高级照明、出色的打字和游戏！

• 华硕 VT229H 评测：触摸屏和无框设计的显示器

• 回顾 TP-Link Neffos X1 Lite：最好的低预算智能手机之一！