CPU市场最大的竞争是英特尔(Intel)和AMD之间长达数十年的战争，在我们看来，这场战斗可能还会持续 10 年或更长时间，因为计算市场需要更快的处理器。对于家庭和商务计算机用户来说，拥有足够快的处理器非常重要，因为它是让一切运转的大脑。没有CPU，您的计算机只是一个无用的外壳，没有人希望它躺在那里。
英特尔与 AMD
AMD和英特尔(Intel)这两个巨头，已经在最高水平上竞争了很长时间，那么，哪一个比另一个更好呢？这篇文章在性能、游戏、超频、定价等方面广泛比较了英特尔 CPU(Intel CPU)和AMD处理器。(AMD)
我们应该指出，AMD和Intel都在相同的x86架构上工作，这就是为什么无论系统内使用哪种品牌的处理器，所有 Windows 10 应用程序都倾向于以相同的方式工作。
对于那些想知道的人来说，AMD能够制造 x86 芯片主要是由于过去与英特尔(Intel)的技术交换协议。当时，AMD只是英特尔(Intel)的第二供应商，但在 1991 年，当该公司决定基于 x86 平台创建自己的芯片并直接与其前合作伙伴竞争时，情况发生了变化。该处理器被称为Am386，它是Intel 80386的克隆。AMD在该处理器上并没有取得巨大成功，但正如我们所知，该公司在过去的几十年里继续为自己做得很好。
表现(Performance)
购买新的微处理器时，性能应该是首先想到的事情之一。首先(First)，您应该确定您需要性能的目的。是为了工作、游戏还是两者兼而有之？
现在，如果您想玩游戏但预算有限，那么购买处理器和专用GPU的成本可能会太高。是的，一些基于英特尔的处理器带有独立显卡，但这些功能根本不足以用于游戏。
AMD的人们决定通过推出Ryzen 5 2400G来改变整个游戏。它配备了独立的Vega 11图形性能。
就目前而言，低预算游戏玩家应该考虑投资AMD产品，因为它们具有最佳的性能价格比。
对于那些负担得起性能最高的技术的人来说，英特尔(Intel)在这方面名列前茅。尽管如此，由于更多的内核和线程数， AMD带来了更好的多线程性能。
如果我们看看英特尔酷睿(Intel Core)i9 和AMD Threadripper，这两家公司的顶级消费芯片，很明显两者都是质量，但英特尔(Intel)在原始性能方面具有优势。
CPU超频(CPU Overclocking)
这就是事情变得有趣的地方，尤其是对英特尔有利的情况，而且多年来一直如此。你看，如果你想从你的计算机处理器中获得最佳的超频性能，那么英特尔(Intel)是你最好的选择。
我们相信这与英特尔更复杂的超线程和涡轮增压技术有关。当然， AMD(AMD)也不甘落后，尤其是Ryzen，但此时球仍在英特尔的球场上。
谁的显卡更好？(Who has the better graphics card?)
这个问题很容易回答，因为AMD在市场上有几款专用显卡，而英特尔(Intel)没有。非常重要的是要指出，要达到这个水平，AMD过去必须收购ATI，而英特尔(Intel)正试图靠自己的力量达到这个水平。
多年来，我们一直听到英特尔(Intel)收购NVIDIA的传言，但此后没有任何类似的事情发生，我们怀疑它永远不会发生。现在，该公司正在打造其专用卡系列，但我们不确定这些卡何时会投放市场。
英特尔(Intel)表示，它计划在 2020 年发布，所以那是一年后。我们不确定英特尔(Intel)的专用显卡技术进展如何，以及它是否具备让NVIDIA和AMD竞争所需的性能。
一件事是肯定的；如果英特尔(Intel)想要吸引非常忠诚的游戏玩家，就必须以比竞争对手便宜的价格出售这些专用GPU 。(GPUs)
因此，就目前而言，英特尔(Intel)远远落后，这表明该公司已决定在其高端 H 系列移动处理器中使用 AMD 的显卡。当然，这不会是永远的，但就目前而言，这是一件好事，因为消费者可能会看到更薄的游戏笔记本电脑的兴起。
我们知道，由于使用了嵌入式多芯片互连桥(Embedded Multi-Die Interconnect Bridge)( EMIB )，这成为可能，但由于这些英特尔驱动的设备目前还没有进入市场，因此很难判断它们将如何与类似的AMD设置。
AMD 或英特尔用于游戏(AMD or Intel for Gaming)
至于哪个处理器更适合游戏，这都是主观的。但是，英特尔(Intel)处理器在设计时考虑到了游戏，并在整体性能中得到了体现。
(AMD)另一方面，AMD绝对不会懈怠，尤其是现在有瑞兹(Ryze)在场。但是，许多游戏已经过优化以充分利用英特尔 CPU ，这也是(Intel CPUs)英特尔(Intel)现在具有优势的主要原因。
同时，AMD是游戏机的王者。Xbox One和PlayStation 4均由AMD提供支持，这要归功于该公司的APU（加速处理单元(Accelerated Processing Unit)）。
价钱(Pricing)
这是AMD和Intel不同的领域之一，即使是现在，也没有太大变化。你看，英特尔(Intel)一直被称为制造优质处理器的公司，这是理所当然的。
很长一段时间以来，英特尔(Intel)凭借最适合工作和游戏的处理器一直位居榜首。当然， AMD(AMD)并没有明显落后，但该公司往往无法兑现在性能方面做出的承诺。
因此，定价一直对AMD有利。但是，自从Bulldozer(Bulldozer)系列CPU(CPUs)推出以来，情况发生了很大变化。2017年，AMD推出锐龙(Ryzen)；猜猜是什么？这是该公司有史以来最好的处理器系列。
它们不仅速度快，而且比英特尔(Intel)提供的便宜。最后(Finally)，英特尔(Intel)正在经历一些长期且必要的竞争，这对消费者来说是个好兆头。
物超所值(Best bang for your buck)
在日常工作中，来自高端的两款相似的AMD和Intel处理器的性能并不会完全不同。但是，如果您正在玩游戏或计划编辑视频，那么您应该深入考虑应该使用哪种处理器设置。
对于使用专用显卡的游戏，我们总有一天会超越AMD(Intel)，但当涉及繁重的视频编辑和使用需要大量多线程的应用程序时，AMD芯片(AMD)可能是最佳选择，因为它拥有更多内核.
从我们的角度来看，AMD倾向于通过中低端市场提供更好的性能价格比，这确实包括游戏。
如果您没有很多钱可以花，那么AMD设置很有意义，但如果您有现金可以扔掉，那么看看英特尔(Intel)提供的产品，让您的朋友惊叹于您的计算机令人印象深刻的功能表现。
你的看法？(Your take?)
AMD vs Intel - What are the main differences?
The bіggest rivalrу in the СPU market is the decades-long war betwеen Intel and AMD, and from our perspective, this battle could go on for another 10 years or more as the computing market requires faster processors. It’s very important for both home and business computer users to have a fast-enough processor because it’s the brain that keeps everything moving. Without a CPU, your computer is just a useless shell, and no one wants that lying around.
Intel vs AMD
Both giants in the form of AMD and Intel, have been competing at the highest level for a very long time, so, which one is better than the other? This post broadly compares Intel CPU with AMD processors for performance, gaming, overclocking, pricing, etc.
We should point out that both AMD and Intel work on the same x86 architecture, which is why all your Windows 10 apps tend to work the same no matter which branded processor is inside the system.
For those who are wondering, AMD can create x86 chips mainly due to a past technology exchange agreement with Intel. At the time, AMD was merely a second-source supplier for Intel, but things changed in 1991 when the company decided to create its own chips based on the x86 platform and compete directly with its former partner. The processor was called the Am386, and it was a clone of the Intel 80386. AMD didn’t have a huge success with that processor, but as we can tell, the company went on to do very well for itself over the decades.
Performance
When purchasing a new microprocessor, performance should be one of the first things that come to mind. First, you should determine what you need the performance for. Is it for work, gaming, or a little bit of both?
Now, if you want to game but you’re on a budget, then chances are it would be too expensive to purchase a processor along with a dedicated GPU. Yes, several Intel-based processors come with discrete graphics, but these aren’t powerful enough for gaming at all.
The folks at AMD decided to change the entire game with the launch of the Ryzen 5 2400G. It comes packed with a discrete Vega 11 graphics performance.
As it stands, then, a low budget gamer should consider investing in an AMD product because they give the best performance to price ratio.
For those who can afford the tech with the most performance, then Intel comes out on top in this regard. Still, AMD brings to the table better multi-threading performance due to more cores and thread count.
If we look at the Intel Core i9 and the AMD Threadripper, which are the top consumer chips from both companies, it’ clear that both are quality, but the Intel has the edge where raw performance is concerned.
CPU Overclocking
This is where things get interesting, especially in Intel’s favor, and this has been the case for many years. You see, if you’re looking to get the best overclocking performance from your computer processor, then Intel is your best bet.
We believe it has everything to do with Intel’s more sophisticated hyperthreading and turbo-boost technology. AMD isn’t far behind, of course, especially with Ryzen, but the ball is still in Intel’s court at this time.
Who has the better graphics card?
It’s easy to answer that question since AMD has several dedicated graphics cards on the market and Intel does not. It’s very important to point out that to get to this level, AMD had to acquire ATI in the past, where Intel is trying to get there on its own.
Over the years, we’ve heard rumors of Intel acquiring NVIDIA, but nothing of the sort has since materialized, and we doubt it’ll ever happen. Now, the company is conjuring up its line of dedicated cards, but we’re not fully certain when these will hit the market.
Intel says it’s planning for 2020 release, so that’s a year from now. We’re not sure how well Intel’s dedicated graphics card technology is coming along and whether or not it’ll have the performance needed to give NVIDIA and AMD a run for their money.
One thing is for certain; Intel will have to sell these dedicated GPUs at a price that is cheaper than rivals if they want to attract gamers who are very loyal.
So, as it stands, Intel is well behind, and it shows because the company has decided to use AMD’s graphics cards with its high-end H-Series mobile processors. Certainly, this won’t be forever, but for now, it’s a good thing because consumers will likely see the rise of thinner gaming laptops.
We understand that this is made possible due to the use of Embedded Multi-Die Interconnect Bridge (EMIB), but since none of these Intel-powered devices have hit the market as of yet, it’s difficult to tell how they would stack up against a similar AMD set up.
AMD or Intel for Gaming
In terms of which processor is better for gaming, well, it’s all subjective. However, the Intel processors have been well designed with gaming in mind, and it shows in the overall performance.
AMD, on the other hand, is definitely no slouch, especially now with Ryze in play. However, many games have been optimized to get the most out of Intel CPUs, which is the main reason why Intel has the edge right now.
At the same time, AMD is the king where gaming consoles are concerned. Both the Xbox One and the PlayStation 4 are powered by AMD, and that’s due to the company’s APU (Accelerated Processing Unit).
Pricing
This is one of the areas both AMD, and Intel differ, and even now, nothing much has changed. You see, Intel has always been known as the company that creates premium processors, and rightfully so.
For a very long time, Intel stood at the top with the best processors for work and gaming. AMD wasn’t significantly behind, of course, but the company tends to fail at delivering on promises made when it comes down to performance.
Because of this, then, pricing has always been in AMD’s favor. However, things have changed a great deal since the launch of the Bulldozer series of CPUs. In the year 2017, AMD launched Ryzen; an guess what? It’s the best family of processors the company has ever come up with.
Not only are they fast, but still cheaper than what Intel has to offer. Finally, Intel is getting some long and needed competition, and that bodes well for consumers.
Best bang for your buck
During daily routines, two similar AMD and Intel processors from the top-end won’t perform radically different from one another. However, if you’re gaming or planning to edit videos, then that’s where you should take deep consideration into which processor setup you should go with.
For gaming with a dedicated graphics card, we’d take Intel over AMD any day, but when it comes down to heavy video editing and the use f applications that require heavy multithreading, an AMD chip could be the best choice due to having more cores.
From our point of view, AMD tends to offer better performance to price ratio via the mid and low-end spectrum of the market, and that does include gaming.
If you do not have a lot of money to spend, then an AMD setup makes a lot of sense, but if you have the cash to throw around, then look to what Intel has to offer and leave your friends in awe with your computer’s impressive performance.
Your take?
