终极CPU之战——AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 与Intel Core i9-9900K。两者都是CPU(CPU)战争每一方的最佳产品，但哪一个名列前茅？我将深入研究并找出哪个CPU真正更好。
长期以来，i9-9900K 被认为是最好的游戏 PC——它是预算有限的游戏玩家、流媒体和内容创作者的首选。但随后在2019 年 7 月(July 2019)，AMD以其高规格、价格具有竞争力的Ryzen 9 3900X 震惊了世界。
这两款CPU(CPUs)的价格非常相似，并且都提供了每个CPU制造商在 2019 年可能为游戏玩家提供的最好的产品。这里有很大的竞争，所以让我们来看看它们在世界顶级视频游戏中的表现。
哪个CPU更适合游戏(Gaming)？_ (Better)锐龙 3900X(Ryzen 3900X)与英特尔(Intel)i9-9900K
我将汇总来自已测试Ryzen 3900X和Intel i9-9900K 的多个来源的数据。从Techspot的评论开始，我们可以看到基于 1080p 分辨率的游戏性能使 i9-9900K 在游戏之间的平均帧数快了约 2-10%。亮点包括 9900K 库存的平均 157 fps 与(Highlights)Apex Legends中 3900X 的 140 fps 平均。
Fortnite在 i9-9900K 库存上显示 252 fps，在AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 库存上显示 238 fps。超频结果与 i9-9900K 获胜的情况相同，尽管两者都只能在其库存表现上多挤出几帧。
Hardware(Hardware Unboxed) Unboxed 的另一篇评论显示，除了Ryzen 3900X在 CS:GO、Monster Hunter World和Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation 中奇怪的 1-3% 性能提升之外，其他所有游戏都看到 i9-9900K 表现更好。
得分最高的是星际争霸 II 的 4v4 模式，9900K 的性能差异为 16%。其他游戏，如PUBG、Fortnite、Apex Legends、生化危机 2(Resident Evil 2)、前线 II(Battlefront II)和战地 V(Battlefield V)看到了 9900K 的改进。在Linus Tech Tips 的得分(Linus Tech Tips’ score)中，CS:GO 在Ryzen 3900X上的表现也更高，但其他所有游戏都以 i9-9900K 位居第一。
最终，帧速率的差异并不大，但足以值得一提。然而，有一件事情需要考虑，它可以让 i9-9900K 获得更多的荣誉——定价。在英国，英特尔(Intel)竞争性地将 9900K 的价格降至 490 英镑，以低于 Ryzen 3900X(Ryzen 3900X)的529.99 英镑(£529.99)的价格标签。
在美国，i9-9900K 的售价为 479 美元，而锐龙 3900X(Ryzen 3900X)的售价为 499 美元。那就是如果你能拿到一个 - 短缺非常严重，这使得以零售价购买顶级AMD芯片组更具挑战性。(AMD)
那么，如果i9-9900K(Ryzen 3900X)在游戏性能和价格上都超过了锐龙 3900X，为什么人们还在购买AMD芯片呢？
购买Ryzen 3900X而不是 i9-9900K 的理由
AMD在游戏方面的表现接近于击败 i9-9900K，但他们并没有完全做到这一点。祝下一代好运，AMD。但是，关于Ryzen 3900X有一些重要的事情需要考虑。
通过采用AM4芯片组，您可以在未来证明您的构建。未来的AMD芯片可能会使用AM4，但已经确认英特尔的下一个芯片组将需要不同的主板。好的主板并不便宜，所以这是许多人的考虑因素。
如果您是创意人士，请阅读此内容。12 核AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 就在前面。Puget Systems的测试表明AMD 3900X在(AMD 3900X)Photoshop中胜过所有其他芯片组，而 3900X 在Premiere Pro 性能(Premiere Pro performance)中胜过 9900K 。
然而，i9-9900K 卷土重来，在After Effects中击败了(After Effects)Ryzen芯片。对于其他任务，也许锐龙 3900X(Ryzen 3900X)是更好的选择。例如，AMD Ryzen 3900X在提取 zip 文件和渲染Blender演示文件等任务中击败了 i9-9900K，这要归功于 12 个内核。
此外，3900X 支持PCI 4.0，所以如果你买得起兼容的主板，你可以期待更快的 NVME(NVME)速度，好吧，现在就是这样。但它是一些很棒的技术，整个计算世界最终将升级到更高的数据带宽和性能。
AMD 3900X也更节能，非常适合省电、小型构建或运行更安静的冷却。
那么这是什么意思？最终，如果您想对系统进行未来验证并使用受益于更多内核的应用程序，您会喜欢Ryzen 3900X。不过，如果你现在想省钱，或者想要更好的游戏性能，i9-9900K 可以说是最好的选择。
概括
感谢您阅读我对 2019 年两款最佳游戏CPU(CPUs)的概述。对于 i9-9900K 如何与Ryzen 3900X 相比(Ryzen 3900X)还有其他问题吗？请(Feel)随时通过社交媒体与我联系，我们可以讨论。
Ryzen 3900X vs Intel i9-9900K – Which CPU Is Truly Better?
The ultimate CPU battle – the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X vs the Intel Core i9-9900K. Both аre the best offеring from each side of the CPU war, but which one comes out on toр? I will dive deep and find out which CPU is truly better.
For a long time the i9-9900K was considered the best gaming PC available – it was the top choice for gamers, streamers, and content creators without a limited budget. But then in July 2019, AMD shocked the world with their high spec, competitively priced Ryzen 9 3900X.
Both CPUs are very similarly priced, and both offer the best each CPU manufacturer can possibly give to gamers in 2019. There’s a big rivalry here, so let’s take a look at how each perform in the world’s top video games.
Which CPU is Better for Gaming? Ryzen 3900X vs Intel i9-9900K
I will be aggregating data from a number of sources that have tested the Ryzen 3900X and the Intel i9-9900K. Starting with a review by Techspot, we can see that performance based on gaming at 1080p resolution puts the i9-9900K about 2-10% faster in average frames from game to game. Highlights include a 157 fps average from the 9900K stock versus a 140 fps average from the 3900X in Apex Legends.
Fortnite showed 252 fps on the i9-9900K stock and 238 fps on the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X stock. With overclocked results it was the same story with the i9-9900K winning, even though both could only squeeze out an extra few frames over their stock performance.
Another review by Hardware Unboxed showcased that besides the Ryzen 3900X’s strange 1-3% performance increase in CS:GO, Monster Hunter World, and Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation, every other game saw the i9-9900K performing better.
The highest score was in Starcraft II’s 4v4 mode with a 16% performance difference in the 9900K’s favor. Other games like PUBG, Fortnite, Apex Legends, Resident Evil 2, Battlefront II, and Battlefield V saw improvements going the 9900K’s way. Linus Tech Tips’ score also saw CS:GO performing higher with the Ryzen 3900X, but every other game had the i9-9900K taking first place.
Ultimately, the difference in frame rate isn’t massive, but it’s enough to warrant a mention. However, there is one thing to consider that gives the i9-9900K more credit – pricing. In the UK, Intel has competitively dropped the 9900K’s price to £490 to undercut the Ryzen 3900X’s £529.99 price tag.
In the US, the i9-9900K is priced at $479, but the Ryzen 3900X sells for $499. That’s if you can get your hands on one – the shortages have been pretty bad, which has made purchasing a top tier AMD chipset for retail price a little more challenging.
So, if the i9-9900K beats out the Ryzen 3900X in gaming performance and pricing, why are people still buying the AMD chip?
Reasons to Buy the Ryzen 3900X Instead of the i9-9900K
AMD was close to beating the i9-9900K’s performance in gaming, but they didn’t quite accomplish it. Better luck next generation, AMD. However, there’s something important to consider about the Ryzen 3900X.
By taking the AM4 chipset, you are future proofing your build. Future AMD chips are likely to use AM4, but it has been confirmed that Intel’s next chipset will require a different motherboard. Good motherboard’s aren’t cheap, so that’s a consideration for many people.
If you are a creative, take a read of this. The 12 core AMD Ryzen 9 3900X comes out ahead, just. Puget Systems’ tests have shown the AMD 3900X beats all other chipsets in Photoshop, and the 3900X beats the 9900K in Premiere Pro performance.
However, the i9-9900K comes back and beats the Ryzen chip in After Effects. For other tasks, perhaps the Ryzen 3900X is a better choice. For example, the AMD Ryzen 3900X beat the i9-9900K in tasks like extracting zip files, and rendering Blender demo files thanks to the 12 cores.
Also, the 3900X supports PCI 4.0, so if you can afford a compatible motherboard, you can expect faster NVME speeds and, well, that’s about it for now. But it’s some awesome tech that the whole computing world will upgrade to eventually for improved data bandwidth and performance.
The AMD 3900X is also more energy efficient, which is great for power saving, small builds, or for running quieter cooling.
So what does this mean? Ultimately if you want to future proof your system and use apps that benefit from more cores, you’ll appreciate the Ryzen 3900X. However, if you want to save money now, or want better gaming performance, the i9-9900K is arguably the best choice.
Summary
Thanks for reading my overview of the two best gaming CPUs in 2019. Have any more questions about how the i9-9900K stacks up against the Ryzen 3900X? Feel free to reach out to me over social media and we can discuss.
