哪一个更适合在 Windows 11/10 上使用？铬(Chrome)或火狐(Firefox)？我们讨论要点以找出Google Chrome和Mozilla Firefox Quantum网络浏览器的主要区别。没有进行任何测试。这篇文章只是基于我作为最终用户的经验。
Firefox Quantum 与 Google Chrome
强调：(Highlights:)
- (Google Chrome)与Mozilla Firefox(Mozilla Firefox)相比，Google Chrome被认为是资源消耗大户；我们将在下面的下一节中研究它
- Mozilla Firefox是一款开源软件浏览器，而Google Chrome使用不同的技巧为用户提供更快的浏览体验
- 人家说Chrome的速度比Firefox好，但是Firefox Quantum进步了很多
- Firefox 的界面设计使其对最终用户的使用稍微好一些
- 谷歌浏览器(Google Chrome)，在Windows 10上，可以将整个屏幕或打开的标签之一投射到不同的屏幕；默认情况下，该功能在Firefox中不可用
- Google Chrome中没有READ视图；扩展是可用的，但用户必须搜索不同的扩展并进行试验以查看适合他们的扩展。
Chrome vs Firefox：系统(System) 资源的使用(Resources)
(Google Chrome)与Mozilla Firefox相比，(Mozilla Firefox)谷歌 Chrome一直在使用更多的内存、磁盘空间和处理器时间。您可以通过在每个浏览器中打开相同的窗口、相同的选项卡，然后在Windows 10中打开(Windows 10)任务管理器(Task Manager)来自行测试。
借助Google Chrome，如果您使用 Chrome任务管理(Task Manager)器，您将获得准确的信息。Chrome 任务(Chrome Task)管理器位于菜单（(Menu)三个垂直(Three vertical)点）-> 更多工具(Tools)->任务管理器(Task Manager)下。Google Chrome 任务管理器(Google Chrome Task Manager)显示每个选项卡和扩展程序如何使用内存和处理器。请参阅下图以了解其外观。
您可以将RAM使用情况、处理器使用情况等变量相加，然后将它们与出现在Windows 10 任务管理器(Windows 10 Task Manager)中的变量总和进行比较。这将使您清楚地了解Chrome(Chrome)拥有多少资源。
Firefox中没有任务管理(Task Manager)器。您必须依靠Windows 10任务管理器(Task Manager)来找出Firefox使用的总(Firefox)RAM、PROCESSOR、DISK USAGE等变量。然后，您可以将Google Chrome与Mozilla Firefox进行比较，看看哪个消耗了多少资源。
由于在Mozilla Firefox(Mozilla Firefox)中没有自定义的任务管理器(Task Manager)或类似的东西，您无法知道Firefox浏览器的不同扩展和其他元素使用的资源（ RAM、处理器时间(PROCESSOR TIME)）的确切数量。找出RAM(RAM)、DISK USAGE等的总消耗量的最佳方法是将这些变量的值加起来几次，比如 3 次或 5 次。然后使用它们的平均值进行比较。
您会发现Google Chrome占用更多磁盘空间(DISK SPACE)和处理器(PROCESSOR)，而Firefox占用更多RAM。
用户界面
Mozilla 在重新设计其用户界面方面已经走了很长一段路，否则有一段时间我无法使用浏览器，因为很难弄清楚如何定位书签等。现在所有这些都改变了。谷歌浏览器(Google Chrome)在过去几年也发生了很大变化，但仍然缺乏导航的便利性。它有三个垂直点，可以打开一个菜单，让用户可以访问其他选项和操作，例如将任何Chrome选项卡(Chrome)投射(Casting)到电视或任何其他设备。同样，它有一个选项，显示包含其他一些功能的更多工具。
换句话说，必须搜索广泛的菜单才能在Google Chrome中完成工作。无法自定义Chrome的外观。使用Firefox，一切都在屏幕上可见，并且它使用三个栏来指示菜单 - 这更易于识别。此外，自定义(Customize)选项允许您排列、添加、删除和重新排列Firefox浏览器的屏幕组件，以便您可以方便地使用命令。
概括
上述分析倾向于表明Google Chrome和Mozilla Firefox的表现都不错。Chrome被怀疑使用了一些技巧来加快浏览速度。Firefox代码很容易获得，因此用户知道(Firefox)Mozilla Firefox中没有这样的技巧。
有些扩展只为Chrome构建（例如YouTubers的VIDIQ），因此在扩展方面Chrome比Firefox有优势。这并不意味着Firefox缺少扩展。Firefox也有各种类型的扩展程序，但在某些情况下，一些公司将其扩展程序限制为仅适用于Chrome，以便更多人使用Google的浏览器。
此外，谷歌(Google)不希望其用户离开Chrome，因此它在浏览器中提供了许多功能，尽管界面对某些人来说很棘手。例如，Cast…选项在Chrome菜单中可用，而对于Firefox，则必须使用相关扩展。因此，两者都以自己的方式独一无二。
在Windows 10上比较(Windows 10)Google Chrome和Mozilla Firefox时，资源消耗和速度几乎没有区别。Firefox Quantum使事情有了很大的改善。然而， Chrome(Chrome)有时似乎变得迟缓。
仅采用其中一种浏览器的主要因素取决于它们的使用方式。假设一个人使用多个显示器并且想要将不同的选项卡投射到不同的显示器上，这个人将使用Google Chrome而不是为(Google Chrome)Firefox搜索类似的扩展。同样，如果YouTuber使用VIDIQ或某些仅限Chrome的扩展程序来分析视频，他或她将不得不使用Chrome。否则(Otherwise)，Firefox更容易操作。
交给你。你的经历？(Over to you. Your experience?)
Google Chrome vs Firefox Quantum for Windows PC
Which one is better for use on Windows 11/10? Chrome or Firefox? Wе dіscuss the main points to find out what are the key differences in Google Chrome & Mozilla Firefox Quantum web browsers. Nо tests were carriеd out. Thіs post is just based on my experience as an end-user.
Firefox Quantum vs Google Chrome
Highlights:
- Google Chrome is considered a resource hog compared to Mozilla Firefox; we’ll look into it in the next section below
- Mozilla Firefox is an open source software browser while Google Chrome uses different tricks to provide users with a faster browsing experience
- Folks say the speed of Chrome is better than Firefox as such, but Firefox Quantum has improved a lot
- Firefox’s interface design makes using it slightly better to end users
- Google Chrome, on Windows 10, can cast the whole screen or one of the open tabs to different screens; the feature is not available in Firefox by default
- There is no READ view in Google Chrome; Extensions are available, but users will have to search different extensions and experiment to see what suits them.
Chrome vs Firefox: Usage of System Resources
Google Chrome has been guilty of using more memory, disk space, and processor time compared to Mozilla Firefox. You can test this on your own by opening same windows, same tabs in each browser and then opening Task Manager in Windows 10.
With Google Chrome, you get precise information if you use Chrome Task Manager. The Chrome Task manager is available under Menu (Three vertical dots) -> More Tools -> Task Manager. The Google Chrome Task Manager shows how each tab and extension is using memory and processor. See the image below to get an idea of how it looks.
You can add up the variables such as the RAM usage, processor usage, and then compare them to the sum of variables as they appear in Windows 10 Task Manager. That would give you a clear idea of how much resources is Chrome holding.
There is no Task Manager in Firefox. You have to depend on Windows 10 Task Manager to find out the total RAM, PROCESSOR, DISK USAGE, etc. variables being used by Firefox. You can then compare Google Chrome with Mozilla Firefox to see which one is consuming how much resources.
Since there is no customized Task Manager or anything similar in Mozilla Firefox, you cannot know the exact amount of resources (RAM, PROCESSOR TIME) being used by different extensions and other elements of the Firefox browser. The best method to find the total consumption of RAM, DISK USAGE, etc. is to add up the values of these variables few times like three times or five times. Then use their average values for comparison.
You’ll find Google Chrome taking up more DISK SPACE and PROCESSOR while Firefox comes higher in the usage of RAM.
User Interface
Mozilla has come a long way in redesigning its user interface else there was a time I couldn’t use the browser as it was pretty difficult to figure out how to locate bookmarks etc. All that is changed now. Google Chrome too has changed a lot in the past few years, but it still lacks ease of navigation. It has three vertical dots that open a menu to let users access other options and actions such as Casting any Chrome tab to TV or any other device. Same way, it has an option saying More Tools that contain some other features.
In other words, one has to search the extensive menu for getting work done in Google Chrome. There is no way to customize the looks of Chrome. With Firefox, everything is visible on screen, and it uses three bars to indicate the menu – which is more identifiable. Plus, the Customize option lets you arrange, add, remove, and rearrange screen components of Firefox browser so you can keep commands handy.
Summary
The above analysis tends to convey that both Google Chrome and Mozilla Firefox are good in their way. Chrome is suspected to use some tricks to speed up browsing. Firefox code is easily available, so users know there are no such tricks in Mozilla Firefox.
Some extensions are built only for Chrome (example VIDIQ for YouTubers), so there is an edge for Chrome over Firefox when it comes to extensions. It doesn’t mean that Firefox lacks extensions. There are all types of extensions for Firefox too but in some cases, some companies restrict their extensions for Chrome only, so that more people use the browser from Google.
Also, Google does not want its users to leave Chrome, so it provides many features inside the browser, though the interface is tricky for some. For example, the Cast… option is available in Chrome menu while for Firefox, one has to use related extensions. Thus, both are unique in their own ways.
There is little difference among resource consumption and speed when comparing Google Chrome with Mozilla Firefox on Windows 10. Things things have improved a lot with Firefox Quantum. Chrome however appears to have become sluggish at times.
The main factors for adopting only one of these browsers depends upon how they are intended to use. Suppose a person uses multiple monitors and wants to cast different tabs to different monitors, the person will use Google Chrome rather than searching for a similar extension for Firefox. Similarly, if a YouTuber uses VIDIQ or some Chrome-only extension for analysis of videos, he or she will have to use Chrome. Otherwise, Firefox is easier to operate.
Over to you. Your experience?
